The women are flanked by tigers and caprids,
as well as by trees, but these are now palms rather than pipals.
The goddesses seem to reflect some influences
from the west, notably in the Hathor flip and their widehipped shape
with turned-out feet, which show strong similarities to Hurrian goddesses
at Carchemish and Hasanlu. But they still show a distinctly Indian character,
especially in the tiger and tree connection, which goes back to the
Harappan period.
The stone rings are not found anywhere else.
Some have a lotus formation instead of a hollow in the center.
|
/\/\/\ |
These north Indian
ringstones date from the early centuries BCE, and are found in sites like
Patna, Taxila in the hill country, Rupar in the Panjaab, and the Ganga
valley.
Patna
|
The goddesses on this ringstone from Taxila are standing between
plants which may be trees but are hard to make out. They are reminiscent
of the palmate designs popular in Canaanite, Israelite, and Syrian art.
These are a major theme in the Nimrud ivories and on the Halaf stelas
of the late Hurrian era, several centuries before the ringstones.
The women's feet are elongated to connect with the plants,
a relation which is emphasized in the next image.
|
/\/\/\ |
 |
This detail from another stone ring with a serial goddess shows
her standing between / in a tree (or so it appears) grasping branches
in each hand. She stands on a lotus and wears bangles. She may have
wings (again characteristic of a popular Hurrian goddess) or possibly
a butterfly headdress. Her vulva and hips are highlighted by a band
of dots. Such markings of a numinous field around the vulva are found
incised or painting on many female figurines from the neolithic period,
and recur later (recall the "hairy triangle" thread of last
year.)
|
/\/\/\ |
Patna |
But check this out: a Syrian plaque from the Middle Bronze
Age (as usual the dating leaves something to be desired). I'm guessing
she is somewhat later than the Indus seal images of the goddess in the
tree, but the dating needs to be clarified. This one's in the Ashmolean
collection.
|
|
Syrian analogue |
On a different note, this Tamil figure, (provenance again unspecified,
dated circa 100 BCE) wears a headdress similar to the Harappan "fan"
style, and quite distinct from the polos headress of far western Asia.
|
|
 |
A whole array of north Indian sculptures from the early centuries
BCE show women wearing piles of fabric draped over the head, which is
also seen at Mohenjo Daro 2000 years earlier. It could be argued that
the two are unrelated, but what other archaeological examples of voluminous
piled headdresses of this type exist outside of ancient India? It seems
reasonable to consider a connection.
|
|
 |